↓ Skip to main content

Conflict Minerals and Supply Chain Due Diligence: An Exploratory Study of Multi-tier Supply Chains

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
418 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conflict Minerals and Supply Chain Due Diligence: An Exploratory Study of Multi-tier Supply Chains
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2963-z
Authors

Hannes Hofmann, Martin C. Schleper, Constantin Blome

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 418 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 415 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 85 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 6%
Researcher 21 5%
Other 60 14%
Unknown 138 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 117 28%
Social Sciences 32 8%
Engineering 23 6%
Environmental Science 22 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 4%
Other 60 14%
Unknown 149 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,137,165
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#177
of 2,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,036
of 386,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#7
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.