You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nurses' and auxiliary nurse midwives' adherence to essential birth practices with peer coaching in Uttar Pradesh, India: a secondary analysis of the BetterBirth trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-019-0962-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rose L. Molina, Brandon J. Neal, Lauren Bobanski, Vinay Pratap Singh, Bridget A. Neville, Megan Marx Delaney, Stuart Lipsitz, Ami Karlage, Mrunal Shetye, Katherine E. A. Semrau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Librarian | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 32 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,088,579
of 23,184,056 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,176
of 1,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,896
of 456,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#23
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,184,056 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.