You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
権威主義体制下における選挙と大衆蜂起の発生
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Comparative Politics, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.11193/jacpoj.5.0_1 |
| Authors |
門屋 寿, 谷口 友季子 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 19 | 20% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 94 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#705,363
of 25,807,758 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Comparative Politics
#1
of 7 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,135
of 480,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Comparative Politics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,807,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them