↓ Skip to main content

Performance and digestibility of growing sheep fed with açai seed meal-based diets

Overview of attention for article published in Tropical Animal Health and Production, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Performance and digestibility of growing sheep fed with açai seed meal-based diets
Published in
Tropical Animal Health and Production, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11250-012-0133-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daiany Iris Gomes, Robson Magno Liberal Véras, Kaliandra Souza Alves, Edenio Detmann, Luis Rennan Sampaio Oliveira, Rafael Mezzomo, Raphael Bicho dos Santos, Sandra de Sousa Barcelos

Abstract

This trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of açai seeds in the diet of sheep, specifically, to evaluate the intake, digestibility, and weight gain in sheep that are fed with diets containing four different mixtures of açai seeds and coastcross hay. Sixteen noncastrated male sheep with an average initial body weight of 22 kg were randomly assigned to one of four diet treatments using initial body weight as a covariate. The diets used coastcross hay as the basal roughage in a 60:40 roughage/concentrate ratio. The concentrate was the same in all the treatments. The açai seed was added to the diet as a partial substitute for the coastcross hay to make up four diet treatments: 0 (control), 5, 10, and 15 % açaí added to the diet on a dry matter basis. The daily weight gain, final body weight, and feed intake were found to linearly increase with the increase in added dietary açai seed meal (P < 0.05). Moreover, increasing the proportions of açai seed meal did not significantly alter the nutrient tract digestibility, except that the crude protein level declined in a linear manner. The inclusion of açai seed as a substitute for coastcross hay increases the intake and the daily weight gain in sheep that are fed with diets using coastcross hay as the basal roughage in a 60:40 roughage/concentrate ratio.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 5%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Librarian 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 38%
Social Sciences 5 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2012.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#556
of 1,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,523
of 166,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.