You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Algorithm based smartphone apps to assess risk of skin cancer in adults: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.m127 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karoline Freeman, Jacqueline Dinnes, Naomi Chuchu, Yemisi Takwoingi, Sue E Bayliss, Rubeta N Matin, Abhilash Jain, Fiona M Walter, Hywel C Williams, Jonathan J Deeks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 410 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 88 | 21% |
| United States | 42 | 10% |
| Spain | 16 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 13 | 3% |
| Canada | 10 | 2% |
| France | 8 | 2% |
| Japan | 8 | 2% |
| Germany | 7 | 2% |
| Italy | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 51 | 12% |
| Unknown | 163 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 279 | 68% |
| Scientists | 68 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 50 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 294 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 14% |
| Researcher | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 17% |
| Unknown | 112 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 5% |
| Engineering | 12 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 12% |
| Unknown | 125 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 567. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#43,114
of 25,962,638 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#857
of 65,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,251
of 483,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#20
of 840 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,962,638 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 840 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.