You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
User acceptance of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) in a Saudi Arabian hospital radiology department
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-12-44 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bakheet Aldosari |
| Abstract |
Compared with the increasingly widespread use of picture archiving and communication systems (PACSs), knowledge concerning users' acceptance of such systems is limited. Knowledge of acceptance is needed given the large (and growing) financial investment associated with the implementation of PACSs, and because the level of user acceptance influences the degree to which the benefits of the systems for healthcare can be realized. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 164 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 24 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 23 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 12% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 40 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2012.
All research outputs
#18,308,895
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,561
of 1,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,954
of 165,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#38
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.