| Title |
Critical Care Utilization for the COVID-19 Outbreak in Lombardy, Italy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2020.4031 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giacomo Grasselli, Antonio Pesenti, Maurizio Cecconi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,777 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 635 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 219 | 8% |
| Canada | 79 | 3% |
| Japan | 68 | 2% |
| Spain | 67 | 2% |
| Italy | 52 | 2% |
| France | 42 | 2% |
| Australia | 36 | 1% |
| Germany | 32 | 1% |
| Other | 417 | 15% |
| Unknown | 1130 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2027 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 357 | 13% |
| Scientists | 318 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 75 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1330 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 162 | 12% |
| Other | 115 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 111 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 100 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 92 | 7% |
| Other | 307 | 23% |
| Unknown | 443 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 379 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 91 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 48 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 36 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 3% |
| Other | 230 | 17% |
| Unknown | 512 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2819. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,505
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#91
of 36,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215
of 409,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#15
of 435 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 435 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.