↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the Healthy Village Program in Kapit District, Sarawak, Malaysia

Overview of attention for article published in Health Promotion International, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of the Healthy Village Program in Kapit District, Sarawak, Malaysia
Published in
Health Promotion International, January 2006
DOI 10.1093/heapro/dai034
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Kiyu, Ashley A Steinkuehler, Jamilah Hashim, John Hall, Peter F S Lee, Richard Taylor

Abstract

Sarawak, Malaysia has a large population of ethnic minorities who live in longhouses in remote rural areas where poverty, non-communicable diseases, accidents and injuries, environmental hazards and communicable diseases all contribute to a lower quality of life than is possible to achieve in these regions. To address these issues and improve the quality of life for longhouse people, the Kapit Divisional Health Office implemented the World Health Organization's Healthy Village programme in 2000. An evaluation was undertaken in 2003 to determine physical and behavioural changes resulting from the programme. The main changes evaluated were those involving smoking habits, exercise habits, health screening, fire safety, environmental improvements and food preparation and hygiene. A qualitative evaluation was conducted using participant observation and key-informant interviews, focus groups and observation. Results indicate that the programme is inspiring changes in various behavioural and physical characteristics of the study population. It is clear that the Healthy Village programme is a widely accepted way of improving health outcomes in longhouses, and that it is succeeding in making beneficial health changes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Cameroon 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 26%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Social Sciences 10 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 15%
Computer Science 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Health Promotion International
#1,042
of 1,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,866
of 172,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Promotion International
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.