↓ Skip to main content

Reducing the health disparities of Indigenous Australians: time to change focus

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
410 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reducing the health disparities of Indigenous Australians: time to change focus
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-151
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Durey, Sandra C Thompson

Abstract

Indigenous peoples have worse health than non-Indigenous, are over-represented amongst the poor and disadvantaged, have lower life expectancies, and success in improving disparities is limited. To address this, research usually focuses on disadvantaged and marginalised groups, offering only partial understanding of influences underpinning slow progress. Critical analysis is also required of those with the power to perpetuate or improve health inequities. In this paper, using Australia as a case example, we explore the effects of 'White', Anglo-Australian cultural dominance in health service delivery to Indigenous Australians. We address the issue using race as an organising principle, underpinned by relations of power.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 410 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 4 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 402 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 112 27%
Student > Master 51 12%
Student > Postgraduate 22 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 5%
Other 16 4%
Other 65 16%
Unknown 123 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 73 18%
Psychology 34 8%
Social Sciences 31 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 60 15%
Unknown 126 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,116,841
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#293
of 8,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,844
of 181,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#4
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.