You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Testing ecosystem accounting in the United States: A case study for the Southeast
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecosystem Services, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101099 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Katherine J.D. Warnell, Marc Russell, Charles Rhodes, Kenneth J. Bagstad, Lydia P. Olander, David J. Nowak, Rajendra Poudel, Pierre D. Glynn, Julie L. Hass, Satoshi Hirabayashi, Jane Carter Ingram, John Matuszak, Kirsten L.L. Oleson, Stephen M. Posner, Ferdinando Villa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 53% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
Colombia | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 88% |
Scientists | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 10% |
Unknown | 33 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 22 | 22% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 14 | 14% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 6% |
Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 10% |
Unknown | 42 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,755,527
of 24,639,073 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystem Services
#122
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,413
of 402,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystem Services
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,639,073 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.