↓ Skip to main content

The Majority of Genetic Variation in Orangutan Personality and Subjective Well-Being is Nonadditive

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Genetics, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Majority of Genetic Variation in Orangutan Personality and Subjective Well-Being is Nonadditive
Published in
Behavior Genetics, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10519-012-9537-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark James Adams, James E. King, Alexander Weiss

Abstract

The heritability of human personality is well-established. Recent research indicates that nonadditive genetic effects, such as dominance and epistasis, play a large role in personality variation. One possible explanation for the latter finding is that there has been recent selection on human personality. To test this possibility, we estimated additive and nonadditive genetic variance in personality and subjective well-being of zoo-housed orangutans. More than half of the genetic variance in these traits could be attributed to nonadditive genetic effects, modeled as dominance. Subjective well-being had genetic overlap with personality, though less so than has been found in humans or chimpanzees. Since a large portion of nonadditive genetic variance in personality is not unique to humans, the nonadditivity of human personality is not sufficient evidence for recent selection of personality in humans. Nonadditive genetic variance may be a general feature of the genetic structure of personality in primates and other animals.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 88 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Student > Master 13 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 45%
Psychology 19 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 15 16%