You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A framework and tool support for the systematic testing of model-based specifications
|
---|---|
Published in |
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, October 2003
|
DOI | 10.1145/990010.990012 |
Authors |
Tim Miller, Paul Strooper |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Finland | 1 | 3% |
Denmark | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 24 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 30% |
Student > Master | 7 | 23% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Researcher | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 25 | 83% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 3 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2009.
All research outputs
#7,482,726
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
#65
of 281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,676
of 51,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 281 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them