You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Simulating articulated subspace self-contact
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1145/2601097.2601181 |
| Authors |
Yun Teng, Miguel A. Otaduy, Theodore Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 22% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 30 | 55% |
| Engineering | 10 | 18% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#17
of 113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,181
of 242,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#20
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 113 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.