Title |
Safe Reintroduction of Cardiovascular Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic From the North American Society Leadership
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.063 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David A. Wood, Ehtisham Mahmud, Vinod H. Thourani, Janarthanan Sathananthan, Alice Virani, Athena Poppas, Robert A. Harrington, Joseph A. Dearani, Madhav Swaminathan, Andrea M. Russo, Ron Blankstein, Sharmila Dorbala, James Carr, Sean Virani, Kenneth Gin, Alan Packard, Vasken Dilsizian, Jean-François Légaré, Jonathon Leipsic, John G. Webb, Andrew D. Krahn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 13 | 33% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 8% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
Dominican Republic | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 19 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 55% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 15% |
Scientists | 4 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 21% |
Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
Professor | 7 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
Other | 18 | 18% |
Unknown | 35 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 14% |
Unknown | 34 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#422,642
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,019
of 16,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,510
of 414,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#24
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.