↓ Skip to main content

Association of 10q23 with colorectal cancer in a Chinese population

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Biology Reports, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of 10q23 with colorectal cancer in a Chinese population
Published in
Molecular Biology Reports, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11033-012-1820-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fen-Xia Li, Xue-Xi Yang, Xuan-Qiu He, Ni-Ya Hu, Ying-Song Wu, Ming Li

Abstract

Recently, a genome-wide association study of gastric cancer (GC) reported the significant association of seven genetic variants (rs4072037 and rs4460629 on 1q22; rs753724, rs11187842, rs3765524, rs2274223, and rs3781264 on 10q23) with GC in a Chinese population. These findings were confirmed in a subsequent independent study. However, it remains unknown whether these loci are associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). This study was to test whether the seven single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with GC were also associated with CRC in a Chinese population. The seven SNPs were genotyped using MassARRAY system. Allelic, genotypic, and haplotypic associations of the SNPs with CRC were investigated using χ(2) tests and logistic regression analysis. The SNPs rs3765524 and rs2274223, located on 10q23, were found to have significant protective effects against CRC, with equal odds ratios per allele. The two SNPs located on 1q22 (rs4072037 and rs4460629) showed a weak association with CRC. No significant association was identified with CRC for the remaining three SNPs located on 10q23 (rs753724, rs11187842, and rs3781264). These results suggest that rs3765524 and rs2274223 on 10q23 are associated with a protective effect against CRC in a Chinese population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 46%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2012.
All research outputs
#18,309,495
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biology Reports
#1,594
of 2,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,446
of 164,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biology Reports
#28
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,873 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.