You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Successful innovation: A time for change?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12350-016-0533-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeffrey M Dendy, Peter Tilkemeier |
| Abstract |
Innovation plays an important role in the advancement of nuclear cardiology, meeting the need for reduced exposure to radiation, and maintaining and improving image quality. As we innovate, it is important to understand the impact of these improvements on the clinical and research knowledge base that has made nuclear cardiology such a powerful clinical tool. The need for comparative studies insuring stability in the clinical applicability of our current guidelines and use of the prognostic power of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging in clinical practice is essential for new and innovative techniques. The existing data demonstrating the significant differences that can occur with the innovative techniques is explored. The need for tools to insure comparable data is available as we begin to utilize registries to inform our clinical practice and research will be an important part of the future of nuclear cardiology. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,755,393
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#1,043
of 2,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,187
of 348,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#18
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.