You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adaptive management for improving species conservation across the captive-wild spectrum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.026 |
| Authors |
Stefano Canessa, Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita, José J. Lahoz-Monfort, Darren M. Southwell, Doug P. Armstrong, Iadine Chadès, Robert C. Lacy, Sarah J. Converse |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 15% |
| Spain | 4 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 12% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Jersey | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 61% |
| Scientists | 10 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 22% |
| Researcher | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 78 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 42 | 23% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 44 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,843,387
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,538
of 6,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,472
of 368,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#19
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.