↓ Skip to main content

Predicting Knee Osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Biomedical Engineering, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting Knee Osteoarthritis
Published in
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10439-015-1393-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce S. Gardiner, Francis G. Woodhouse, Thor F. Besier, Alan J. Grodzinsky, David G. Lloyd, Lihai Zhang, David W. Smith

Abstract

Treatment options for osteoarthritis (OA) beyond pain relief or total knee replacement are very limited. Because of this, attention has shifted to identifying which factors increase the risk of OA in vulnerable populations in order to be able to give recommendations to delay disease onset or to slow disease progression. The gold standard is then to use principles of risk management, first to provide subject-specific estimates of risk and then to find ways of reducing that risk. Population studies of OA risk based on statistical associations do not provide such individually tailored information. Here we argue that mechanistic models of cartilage tissue maintenance and damage coupled to statistical models incorporating model uncertainty, united within the framework of structural reliability analysis, provide an avenue for bridging the disciplines of epidemiology, cell biology, genetics and biomechanics. Such models promise subject-specific OA risk assessment and personalized strategies for mitigating or even avoiding OA. We illustrate the proposed approach with a simple model of cartilage extracellular matrix synthesis and loss regulated by daily physical activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 206 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 18%
Student > Master 33 16%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 11 5%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 53 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 44 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Sports and Recreations 12 6%
Computer Science 6 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 76 36%