↓ Skip to main content

Microfragmentation concept explains non-positive environmental heterogeneity–diversity relationships

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microfragmentation concept explains non-positive environmental heterogeneity–diversity relationships
Published in
Oecologia, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00442-012-2398-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauri Laanisto, Riin Tamme, Inga Hiiesalu, Robert Szava-Kovats, Antonio Gazol, Meelis Pärtel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 122 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 25%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 14 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 50%
Environmental Science 34 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 21 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2014.
All research outputs
#16,443,300
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,527
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,071
of 181,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.