You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Life cycle assessment of consumption choices: a comparison between disposable and rechargeable household batteries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11367-016-1134-5 |
| Authors |
Giovanni Dolci, Camilla Tua, Mario Grosso, Lucia Rigamonti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Finland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 22 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Energy | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 38 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,535,253
of 25,046,944 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#69
of 1,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,585
of 345,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,046,944 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.