↓ Skip to main content

Functions of miR-1 and miR-133a during the postnatal development of masseter and gastrocnemius muscles

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functions of miR-1 and miR-133a during the postnatal development of masseter and gastrocnemius muscles
Published in
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11010-015-2450-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megumi Nariyama, Manami Mori, Emi Shimazaki, Hitoshi Ando, Yoshiki Ohnuki, Tokuhisa Abo, Akira Yamane, Yoshinobu Asada

Abstract

The present study investigated the function of miR-1 and miR-133a during the postnatal development of mouse skeletal muscles. The amounts of miR-1 and miR-133a were measured in mouse masseter and gastrocnemius muscles between 1 and 12 weeks after birth with real-time polymerase chain reaction and those of HDACs, MEF2, MyoD family, MCK, SRF, and Cyclin D1 were measured at 2 and 12 weeks with Western blotting. In both the masseter and gastrocnemius muscles, the amount of miR-1 increased between 1 and 12 weeks, whereas the amount of HADC4 decreased between 2 and 12 weeks. In the masseter muscle, those of MEF2, MyoD, Myogenin, and MCK increased between 2 and 12 weeks, whereas, in the gastrocnemius muscle, only those of MRF4 and MCK increased. The extent of these changes in the masseter muscle was greater than that in the gastrocnemius muscle. The amounts of miR-133a, SRF, and Cyclin D1 did not change significantly in the masseter muscle between 1 and 12 weeks after birth. By contrast, in the gastrocnemius muscle, the amounts of miR-133a and Cyclin D1 increased, whereas that of SRF decreased. Our findings suggest that the regulatory pathway of miR-1 via HDAC4 and MEF2 plays a more prominent role during postnatal development in the masseter muscle than in the gastrocnemius muscle, whereas that of miR-133a via SRF plays a more prominent role in the gastrocnemius muscle than in the masseter muscle.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2016.
All research outputs
#17,806,995
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#1,484
of 2,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,773
of 265,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#18
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,309 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.