| Title |
Policy learning and crisis policy-making: quadruple-loop learning and COVID-19 responses in South Korea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Policy and Society, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/14494035.2020.1785195 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sabinne Lee, Changho Hwang, M Jae Moon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 16% |
| Canada | 7 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
| India | 3 | 5% |
| South Africa | 2 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 2 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 89% |
| Scientists | 4 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 288 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 25 | 9% |
| Researcher | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 17% |
| Unknown | 125 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 71 | 25% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 19 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 14% |
| Unknown | 129 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2023.
All research outputs
#516,837
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from Policy and Society
#6
of 374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,027
of 434,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy and Society
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.