You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography systems using a phantom eye model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biophotonics, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jbio.201200018 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roy de Kinkelder, Daniel M. de Bruin, Frank D. Verbraak, Ton G. van Leeuwen, Dirk J. Faber |
| Abstract |
To quantify differences in nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by various spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) systems, we developed a phantom eye model. We tested twelve SD-OCT systems of four manufacturers. All systems combined overestimated the 49 µm thick phantom RNFL thickness on average by 18 µm. Within brands, thickness measurements differed statistically significant for one Topcon, one RTVue and one Cirrus. Between brands, thickness determined with RTVue and Topcon differed statistically significant from Cirrus and Spectralis. The maximum difference between mean thicknesses is 3.6 µm within brands and 7.7 µm between brands. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 20% |
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2013.
All research outputs
#15,687,538
of 24,851,605 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biophotonics
#721
of 2,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,576
of 168,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biophotonics
#20
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,851,605 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,330 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.