↓ Skip to main content

Blaming climate change? How Indian mainstream media covered two extreme weather events in 2015

Overview of attention for article published in Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blaming climate change? How Indian mainstream media covered two extreme weather events in 2015
Published in
Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, July 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102119
Authors

James Painter, Shannon Osaka, Joshua Ettinger, Peter Walton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 8 13%
Lecturer 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 16%
Social Sciences 9 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 10%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Linguistics 2 3%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 22 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,710,403
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#677
of 2,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,366
of 432,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#15
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.