| Title |
Lung Ultrasound and Pulmonary Congestion During Stress Echocardiography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.04.020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Chiara Scali, Angela Zagatina, Quirino Ciampi, Lauro Cortigiani, Antonello D'Andrea, Clarissa Borguezan Daros, Nadezhda Zhuravskaya, Jaroslaw D. Kasprzak, Karina Wierzbowska-Drabik, José Luis de Castro e Silva Pretto, Ana Djordjevic-Dikic, Branko Beleslin, Marija Petrovic, Nikola Boskovic, Milorad Tesic, Ines Monte, Iana Simova, Martina Vladova, Alla Boshchenko, Alexander Vrublevsky, Rodolfo Citro, Miguel Amor, Paul E. Vargas Mieles, Rosina Arbucci, Pablo Martin Merlo, Diego M. Lowenstein Haber, Claudio Dodi, Fausto Rigo, Suzana Gligorova, Milica Dekleva, Sergio Severino, Fabio Lattanzi, Doralisa Morrone, Maurizio Galderisi, Marco A.R. Torres, Alessandro Salustri, Hugo Rodrìguez-Zanella, Fabio Marco Costantino, Albert Varga, Gergely Agoston, Eduardo Bossone, Francesco Ferrara, Nicola Gaibazzi, Jelena Celutkiene, Maciej Haberka, Fabio Mori, Maria Grazia D'Alfonso, Barbara Reisenhofer, Ana Cristina Camarozano, Marcelo Haertel Miglioranza, Ewa Szymczyk, Paulina Wejner-Mik, Katarzyna Wdowiak-Okrojek, Tamara Preradovic-Kovacevic, Tonino Bombardini, Miodrag Ostojic, Aleksandra Nikolic, Federica Re, Andrea Barbieri, Giovanni Di Salvo, Elisa Merli, Paolo Colonna, Valentina Lorenzoni, Michele De Nes, Marco Paterni, Clara Carpeggiani, Jorge Lowenstein, Eugenio Picano, Stress Echo 2020 Study Group of the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 19 | 15% |
| Mexico | 10 | 8% |
| Argentina | 9 | 7% |
| Colombia | 6 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 5 | 4% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| Brazil | 4 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 88 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 20% |
| Scientists | 9 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 42% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2022.
All research outputs
#548,775
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#122
of 2,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,841
of 430,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#4
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.