@dennisgrauslund Hard to say for sure @dennisgrauslund because there's >300 tourism journals I think my answer is "no" In my lit reviews I find gems across a wide range of journals+conferences And top journals still tolerate fundamentally flawed meth
RT @Marek_Kwiek: Why desk-rejection? Just three pages. Useful for quan social scientists! "Annals receives over 1100 manuscripts annually…
Certainly an interesting look into how a journal is thinking about submissions.
RT @Scholarly_Peers: Some insights into the reasons why quantitative papers get desk rejected. https://t.co/zKIY6mfIr6
Some insights into the reasons why quantitative papers get desk rejected. https://t.co/zKIY6mfIr6
Why desk-rejection? Just three pages. Useful for quan social scientists! "Annals receives over 1100 manuscripts annually–60% are desk-rejected. This viewpoint explains why this is the case for quantitative papers based on primary data". https://t.co/77e
RT @SaraDolnicar: Definitely a useful @AnnTourRes bite-sized session to attend Most manuscripts get rejected for the same reasons, many of…
RT @SaraDolnicar: Definitely a useful @AnnTourRes bite-sized session to attend Most manuscripts get rejected for the same reasons, many of…
Why do journals usually desk-reject? Should they be transparent about the reasons? Here, the editor of the Annals of Tourism Research explains her reasons not to consider some manuscripts: https://t.co/cV0CuYAZPn
RT @SaraDolnicar: Definitely a useful @AnnTourRes bite-sized session to attend Most manuscripts get rejected for the same reasons, many of…
Definitely a useful @AnnTourRes bite-sized session to attend Most manuscripts get rejected for the same reasons, many of which are very easily avoided Advance reading about main rejection reasons for quantitative papers using primary data here: https://t
RT @SaraDolnicar: A common #deskrejection reason for quantitative papers is that they are too applied. I explain in https://t.co/cWcI9hu5C…
A common #deskrejection reason for quantitative papers is that they are too applied. I explain in https://t.co/cWcI9hu5Cb #AnnTourRes publishes what's marked in green below. A good home for context-independent empirical insights gained from applied rese
RT @SaraDolnicar: "Why quantitative papers based on primary data get desk-rejected by Annals of Tourism Research" now freely accessible a…
RT @SaraDolnicar: "Why quantitative papers based on primary data get desk-rejected by Annals of Tourism Research" now freely accessible a…
RT @SaraDolnicar: "Why quantitative papers based on primary data get desk-rejected by Annals of Tourism Research" now freely accessible a…
RT @SaraDolnicar: "Why quantitative papers based on primary data get desk-rejected by Annals of Tourism Research" now freely accessible a…
RT @SaraDolnicar: "Why quantitative papers based on primary data get desk-rejected by Annals of Tourism Research" now freely accessible a…
RT @SaraDolnicar: "Why quantitative papers based on primary data get desk-rejected by Annals of Tourism Research" now freely accessible a…
RT @SaraDolnicar: "Why quantitative papers based on primary data get desk-rejected by Annals of Tourism Research" now freely accessible a…
"Why quantitative papers based on primary data get desk-rejected by Annals of Tourism Research" now freely accessible at https://t.co/Wp8EaTW7Xs @ScottMcCabe13 + I hope it will help authors to prevent an unnecessary #deskrejection #AnnTourRes #editoro