You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do female legislators benefit from incumbency advantage? Incumbent renomination in a flexible-list PR system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Electoral Studies, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102189 |
| Authors |
Michal Smrek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 6 | 29% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Ghana | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 52% |
| Scientists | 9 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 16 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,104,576
of 25,888,937 outputs
Outputs from Electoral Studies
#454
of 1,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,817
of 429,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electoral Studies
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,888,937 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.