You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Wound complication of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in distal tibia fractures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Orthopaedics, June 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00264-007-0384-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T. W. Lau, F. Leung, C. F. Chan, S. P. Chow |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 24% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 58% |
| Engineering | 8 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2016.
All research outputs
#4,995,457
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from International Orthopaedics
#174
of 1,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,374
of 75,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Orthopaedics
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,611 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.