You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lack of uniform diagnostic criteria for cervical radiculopathy in conservative intervention studies: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-012-2297-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erik J. Thoomes, Gwendolijne G. M. Scholten-Peeters, Alice J. de Boer, Remy A. Olsthoorn, Karin Verkerk, Christine Lin, Arianne P. Verhagen |
| Abstract |
Cervical radiculopathy (CR) is a common diagnosis. It is unclear if intervention studies use uniform definitions and criteria for patient selection. Our objective was to assess the uniformity of diagnostic criteria and definitions used in intervention studies to select patients with CR. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 9% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 19% |
| Unknown | 39 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 20% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 41 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2012.
All research outputs
#20,163,398
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#3,641
of 4,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,167
of 163,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#43
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.