↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with caregiving burden and mental health conditions in caregivers of patients with anorexia nervosa in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in BioPsychoSocial Medicine, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with caregiving burden and mental health conditions in caregivers of patients with anorexia nervosa in Japan
Published in
BioPsychoSocial Medicine, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13030-016-0073-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chisato Ohara, Gen Komaki, Zentaro Yamagata, Mari Hotta, Toshiko Kamo, Tetuya Ando

Abstract

There are no studies about the caregiving burdens in families of patients with eating disorders in Japan, and only limited studies on the role of caregivers' stress coping, social support, and mental health. This study examines caregiving burdens, mental health conditions, and associated factors in caregivers of anorexia nervosa (AN) patients in Japan. Seventy-nine principal caregivers (70 mothers, 5 fathers, 3 spouses and 1 grandmother; mean age 56.0 ± 8.0 years) for outpatients with AN (all female; mean age 26.6 ± 7.9 years; BMI 14.6 ± 3.2 kg/m(2)) were evaluated using self-report questionnaires in a cross-sectional study. The questionnaires included caregiving burden (J-ZBI_8), mental health conditions (GHQ28), stress coping styles (CISS), social support (SNQ), severity of the patient's symptoms from the family's perspective (ABOS), and family functioning (GF-FAD). Clinical information about the patients was also obtained. Mean caregiving burden assessed by J-ZBI_8 score was 12.4 ± 7.0 (SD). The total GHQ score was 31.6 ± 13.7 (Likert scoring) and 9.2 ± 7.0 (GHQ scoring). Of the respondents, 48 (60.7 %) indicated a high risk for mental health problems that exceeded the cutoff point of the GHQ. Significantly higher caregiving burden and poor mental health conditions were shown in the group who had contact with patients > 6 h a day compared to the group with daily patient contact < 3 h (F (2, 76) = 3.19, p = 0.047 and F (2, 76) = 9.39, p < 0.001, respectively). Stepwise multiple regression analysis indicated that the factors that significantly predicted the caregiving burden were severity of the patient's symptoms from the family's perspective (β = 0.47, p < 0.001) and Emotion-Oriented Coping (β = 0.38, p = 0.002) (R(2) = 0.401), while predictors of mental health conditions were Emotion-Oriented Coping (β = 0.522, p < 0.001), Affective Support (β = -0.419, p < 0.001), and contact time with patient (β = 0.201, p = 0.042) (R(2) = 0.602). Caregivers of AN patients experienced heavy burdens and manifested poor mental health conditions. The severity of the patient's symptoms from the family's perspective and the greater use of emotion-oriented coping were associated with higher burdens. Greater use of emotion-oriented coping, less affective support and longer contact with patients were related to worse mental health conditions. Interventions to promote caregivers' adaptive coping styles may help reduce their caregiving burden and improve their mental health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 20 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 21 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2016.
All research outputs
#17,810,002
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#215
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,926
of 352,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.