You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Children’s and Apes’ Preparatory Responses to Two Mutually Exclusive Possibilities
|
---|---|
Published in |
Current Biology, June 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.062 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jonathan Redshaw, Thomas Suddendorf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 8% |
United States | 3 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Greece | 1 | 3% |
Finland | 1 | 3% |
Israel | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 23 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 28 | 72% |
Scientists | 8 | 21% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Hungary | 2 | 2% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 109 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 16% |
Researcher | 16 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 18% |
Unknown | 17 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 48 | 42% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 11% |
Neuroscience | 9 | 8% |
Linguistics | 3 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 12% |
Unknown | 25 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#578,439
of 25,476,463 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#2,066
of 14,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,485
of 368,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#47
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,476,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.