↓ Skip to main content

One-year clinical study of NeuroRegen scaffold implantation following scar resection in complete chronic spinal cord injury patients

Overview of attention for article published in Science China Life Sciences, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
One-year clinical study of NeuroRegen scaffold implantation following scar resection in complete chronic spinal cord injury patients
Published in
Science China Life Sciences, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11427-016-5080-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhifeng Xiao, Fengwu Tang, Jiaguang Tang, Huilin Yang, Yannan Zhao, Bing Chen, Sufang Han, Nuo Wang, Xing Li, Shixiang Cheng, Guang Han, Changyu Zhao, Xiaoxiong Yang, Yumei Chen, Qin Shi, Shuxun Hou, Sai Zhang, Jianwu Dai

Abstract

The objective of this clinical study was to assess the safety and feasibility of the collagen scaffold, NeuroRegen scaffold, one year after scar tissue resection and implantation. Scar tissue is a physical and chemical barrier that prevents neural regeneration. However, identification of scar tissue is still a major challenge. In this study, the nerve electrophysiology method was used to distinguish scar tissue from normal neural tissue, and then different lengths of scars ranging from 0.5-4.5 cm were surgically resected in five complete chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. The NeuroRegen scaffold along with autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMCs), which have been proven to promote neural regeneration and SCI recovery in animal models, were transplanted into the gap in the spinal cord following scar tissue resection. No obvious adverse effects related to scar resection or NeuroRegen scaffold transplantation were observed immediately after surgery or at the 12-month follow-up. In addition, patients showed partially autonomic nervous function improvement, and the recovery of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) from the lower limbs was also detected. The results indicate that scar resection and NeuroRegen scaffold transplantation could be a promising clinical approach to treating SCI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 14 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Neuroscience 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2016.
All research outputs
#14,856,117
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Science China Life Sciences
#429
of 1,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,891
of 352,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Life Sciences
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.