You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Motor imagery for gait rehabilitation after stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013019.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephano Silva, Lorenna Rdm Borges, Lorenna Santiago, Larissa Lucena, Ana R Lindquist, Tatiana Ribeiro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 17% |
| Sweden | 3 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 86% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 299 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 11% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 5% |
| Researcher | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 11% |
| Unknown | 149 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 15% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Unknown | 161 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,437,197
of 25,844,815 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,936
of 13,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,519
of 431,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,815 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.