You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implications of Alternative Definitions of Peri-Procedural Myocardial Infarction After Coronary Revascularization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Gregson, Gregg W Stone, Ori Ben-Yehuda, Björn Redfors, David E Kandzari, Marie-Claude Morice, Martin B Leon, Ioanna Kosmidou, Nicholas J Lembo, W Morris Brown, Dimitri Karmpaliotis, Adrian P Banning, Jose Pomar, Manel Sabaté, Charles A Simonton, Ovidiu Dressler, Arie Pieter Kappetein, Joseph F Sabik, Patrick W Serruys, Stuart J Pocock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 15% |
| United States | 9 | 12% |
| Spain | 4 | 5% |
| Italy | 4 | 5% |
| Argentina | 4 | 5% |
| France | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 52% |
| Scientists | 17 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 48% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 28 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2021.
All research outputs
#775,963
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,951
of 16,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,178
of 432,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#54
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.