You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Honest advocacy for nature: presenting a persuasive narrative for conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-016-1163-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David C. Rose, Peter N. M. Brotherton, Susan Owens, Thomas Pryke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 114 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 42 | 37% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 51 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 81 | 71% |
| Scientists | 26 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 21% |
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 39 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 33 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#531,580
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#52
of 2,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,452
of 368,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.