You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Defining, treating and preventing hospital acquired pneumonia: European perspective
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00134-008-1336-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Antoni Torres, Santiago Ewig, Harmut Lode, Jean Carlet |
Abstract |
Many controversies still remain in the management of hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP), and ventilation-acquired pneumonia (VAP), Three European Societies, European Respiratory Society (ERS), European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), were interested in producing a document on HAP and VAP with European perspective. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 4 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
Colombia | 3 | <1% |
Spain | 3 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Slovakia | 1 | <1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | <1% |
Unknown | 281 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 42 | 14% |
Researcher | 42 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 9% |
Student > Master | 26 | 9% |
Other | 86 | 28% |
Unknown | 55 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 163 | 54% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 2% |
Other | 25 | 8% |
Unknown | 66 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,649,623
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,270
of 5,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,243
of 92,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.