↓ Skip to main content

Effect of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment on pregnancy and postpartum-related relapses in multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment on pregnancy and postpartum-related relapses in multiple sclerosis
Published in
Journal of Neurology, September 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00415-004-0495-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anat Achiron, Irena Kishner, Mark Dolev, Yael Stern, Mordechai Dulitzky, Eyal Schiff, Reuven Achiron

Abstract

Acute exacerbations may complicate the course of pregnancy and the postpartum period in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). To evaluate relapse rate and the effect of immunomodulatory treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) during pregnancy and the postpartum period we retrospectively analysed the data of 108 pregnant RRMS patients. Group I patients were not treated, Group II patients were treated with IVIg 0.4 g/kg body weight/day for 5 consecutive days within the first week after delivery with additional booster doses of 0.4 g/kg body weight/day at 6 and 12 weeks postpartum (defined as 12 weeks after labor), and Group III patients were treated continuously with IVIg during gestation and the postpartum period (0.4 g/kg body weight/day for 5 consecutive days within the 6-8 weeks of gestation with additional booster doses of 0.4 g/kg body weight/day once every 6 weeks until 12 weeks postpartum). All patients underwent antenatal care and fetal ultrasonographic surveillance examinations. Relapse rate per woman per year during the pregnancy and the postpartum period as well as neonatal outcome data and IVIg related adverse events were analysed. Relapse rate per woman per year for patients treated with IVIg for the whole pregnancy and postpartum period (Group III, N = 28) compared with the untreated Group I patients (N = 39) were as follows: first trimester 0.43 vs. 0.72, second trimester 0.15 vs. 0.61, third trimester 0.0 vs. 0.41, and postpartum period 0.28 vs.1.33 (p < 0.05). Patients treated with IVIg only during the postpartum period (Group II, N = 41) also showed a decrease in relapse rate compared with untreated Group I patients, 0.58 vs. 1.33 (p = 0.012). The mean maternal age, disease duration, gestational age at delivery and fetal delivery weight did not significantly differ between the three groups. Mode of delivery, obstetrical complications, the use of epidural analgesia and breast-feeding, did not affect postpartum relapse rate. No severe adverse events were associated with IVIg treatment either during the pregnancy or postpartum period for the patients and newborns.We conclude that in RRMS patients IVIg treatment could be considered as an optional treatment to reduce the incidence of pregnancy and postpartum-related relapses. Further randomized double-blind studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 17%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Other 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Other 30 26%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Neuroscience 9 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 23 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2014.
All research outputs
#20,165,369
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,958
of 4,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,243
of 58,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#14
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.