You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical service organisation for heart failure
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002752.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrea Takeda, Stephanie JC Taylor, Rod S Taylor, Faisal Khan, Henry Krum, Martin Underwood |
Abstract |
Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a serious, common condition associated with frequent hospitalisation. Several different disease management interventions (clinical service organisation interventions) for patients with CHF have been proposed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 20% |
Netherlands | 2 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
France | 1 | 10% |
United States | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | <1% |
Spain | 3 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Sweden | 2 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 365 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 75 | 20% |
Researcher | 50 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 31 | 8% |
Other | 30 | 8% |
Other | 89 | 23% |
Unknown | 70 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 159 | 42% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 64 | 17% |
Psychology | 21 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 2% |
Other | 43 | 11% |
Unknown | 69 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,873,051
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,002
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,910
of 187,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.