You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator‐associated pneumonia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008367.pub4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tingting Zhao, Xinyu Wu, Qi Zhang, Chunjie Li, Helen V Worthington, Fang Hua |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 16 | 12% |
Mexico | 14 | 10% |
United States | 8 | 6% |
Australia | 6 | 4% |
Ecuador | 5 | 4% |
Saudi Arabia | 3 | 2% |
Colombia | 3 | 2% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 1% |
Spain | 2 | 1% |
Other | 13 | 10% |
Unknown | 64 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 101 | 74% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 20% |
Scientists | 7 | 5% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 536 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 536 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 59 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 58 | 11% |
Other | 28 | 5% |
Researcher | 27 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 4% |
Other | 60 | 11% |
Unknown | 282 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 117 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 68 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 1% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 1% |
Psychology | 6 | 1% |
Other | 36 | 7% |
Unknown | 296 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#341,062
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#568
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,673
of 531,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.