↓ Skip to main content

A Comparison of Brain Gene Expression Levels in Domesticated and Wild Animals

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Genetics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Comparison of Brain Gene Expression Levels in Domesticated and Wild Animals
Published in
PLoS Genetics, September 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002962
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank W. Albert, Mehmet Somel, Miguel Carneiro, Ayinuer Aximu-Petri, Michel Halbwax, Olaf Thalmann, Jose A. Blanco-Aguiar, Irina Z. Plyusnina, Lyudmila Trut, Rafael Villafuerte, Nuno Ferrand, Sylvia Kaiser, Per Jensen, Svante Pääbo

Abstract

Domestication has led to similar changes in morphology and behavior in several animal species, raising the question whether similarities between different domestication events also exist at the molecular level. We used mRNA sequencing to analyze genome-wide gene expression patterns in brain frontal cortex in three pairs of domesticated and wild species (dogs and wolves, pigs and wild boars, and domesticated and wild rabbits). We compared the expression differences with those between domesticated guinea pigs and a distant wild relative (Cavia aperea) as well as between two lines of rats selected for tameness or aggression towards humans. There were few gene expression differences between domesticated and wild dogs, pigs, and rabbits (30-75 genes (less than 1%) of expressed genes were differentially expressed), while guinea pigs and C. aperea differed more strongly. Almost no overlap was found between the genes with differential expression in the different domestication events. In addition, joint analyses of all domesticated and wild samples provided only suggestive evidence for the existence of a small group of genes that changed their expression in a similar fashion in different domesticated species. The most extreme of these shared expression changes include up-regulation in domesticates of SOX6 and PROM1, two modulators of brain development. There was almost no overlap between gene expression in domesticated animals and the tame and aggressive rats. However, two of the genes with the strongest expression differences between the rats (DLL3 and DHDH) were located in a genomic region associated with tameness and aggression, suggesting a role in influencing tameness. In summary, the majority of brain gene expression changes in domesticated animals are specific to the given domestication event, suggesting that the causative variants of behavioral domestication traits may likewise be different.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Turkey 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 248 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 67 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 23%
Student > Master 28 10%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Professor 18 7%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 25 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 161 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 12%
Psychology 10 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 3%
Environmental Science 6 2%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 34 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,414,958
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#1,057
of 8,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,524
of 191,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#12
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.