You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A metric-based analysis of structure and content of telephone consultations of final-year medical students in a high-fidelity emergency medicine simulation
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMJ Open, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001298 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Patrick Henn, David Power, Simon D Smith, Theresa Power, Helen Hynes, Robert Gaffney, John D McAdoo |
Abstract |
In this study we aimed to analyse the structure and content of telephone consultations of final-year medical students in a high-fidelity emergency medicine simulation. The purpose was to identify any areas of deficiency within structure and content in the effective transfer of clinical information via the telephone of final-year medical students. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 24 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 20% |
Researcher | 3 | 12% |
Lecturer | 3 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 20% |
Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 32% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2012.
All research outputs
#2,573,775
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#5,026
of 25,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,229
of 187,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#35
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.