You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The role of negative emotionality and impulsivity in depressive/anxiety disorders and alcohol dependence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychological Medicine, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s0033291712002152 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. Boschloo, N. Vogelzangs, W. van den Brink, J. H. Smit, A. T. F. Beekman, B. W. J. H. Penninx |
| Abstract |
Much is still unclear about the role of personality in the structure of common psychiatric disorders such as depressive/anxiety disorders and alcohol dependence. This study will therefore examine whether various traits of negative emotionality and impulsivity showed shared or specific associations with these disorders. Method Cross-sectional data were used from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA), including individuals with no DSM-IV psychiatric disorder (n = 460), depressive/anxiety disorder only (i.e. depressive and/or anxiety disorder; n = 1398), alcohol dependence only (n = 32) and co-morbid depressive/anxiety disorder plus alcohol dependence (n = 358). Aspects of negative emotionality were neuroticism, hopelessness, rumination, worry and anxiety sensitivity, whereas aspects of impulsivity included disinhibition, thrill/adventure seeking, experience seeking and boredom susceptibility. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 17% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 56 | 42% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,151,903
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Medicine
#3,794
of 5,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,976
of 172,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Medicine
#33
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.