You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Targeting the p300/CBP Axis in Lethal Prostate CancerTargeting the p300/CBP Axis in Lethal Prostate Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Discovery, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-0751 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Welti, Adam Sharp, Nigel Brooks, Wei Yuan, Christopher McNair, Saswati N. Chand, Abhijit Pal, Ines Figueiredo, Ruth Riisnaes, Bora Gurel, Jan Rekowski, Denisa Bogdan, William West, Barbara Young, Meera Raja, Amy Prosser, Jordan Lane, Stuart Thomson, Jenny Worthington, Stuart Onions, Jonathan Shannon, Silvia Paoletta, Richard Brown, Don Smyth, Gareth W. Harbottle, Veronica S. Gil, Susana Miranda, Mateus Crespo, Ana Ferreira, Rita Pereira, Nina Tunariu, Suzanne Carreira, Antje J. Neeb, Jian Ning, Amanda Swain, David Taddei, SU2C/PCF International Prostate Cancer Dream Team, Matthew J. Schiewer, Karen E. Knudsen, Neil Pegg, Johann S. de Bono |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 14% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 62% |
| Scientists | 17 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 52 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 54 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2021.
All research outputs
#962,496
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#496
of 4,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,910
of 522,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#24
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 522,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.