You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence of concordant and discordant comorbidity in chronic kidney disease: a large cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x714125 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clare MacRae, Stewart W Mercer, Bruce Guthrie, David Henderson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 67% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 144 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 79 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 83 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,497,119
of 25,250,629 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#719
of 4,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,988
of 523,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#28
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,250,629 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 523,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.