Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2021

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

So far, Altmetric has seen 7 X posts from 6 X users, with an upper bound of 24,088 followers.

@DeeHarrPhD @TeatskeA Great to see this level of participation 👆. Important to identify methods that work by discussing with children, this and also https://t.co/ATl4VXxCfH @harman_nicola . COMET review shows room for improvement - https://t.co/V55ULPjMfD.

RT @MaritaHennessy: Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6th annual update to a systematic review of…

RT @MaritaHennessy: Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6th annual update to a systematic review of…

RT @MaritaHennessy: Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6th annual update to a systematic review of…

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 3 additional X posts.