↓ Skip to main content

Religiosity as a Moderator of Self-Efficacy and Social Support in Predicting Traumatic Stress Among Combat Soldiers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Religion and Health, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Religiosity as a Moderator of Self-Efficacy and Social Support in Predicting Traumatic Stress Among Combat Soldiers
Published in
Journal of Religion and Health, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10943-016-0187-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yael Israel-Cohen, Oren Kaplan, Smadar Noy, Gabriela Kashy-Rosenbaum

Abstract

Based on a sample of 54 Israeli soldiers (51 % non-religious, 49 % religious) surveyed upon their return from combat, this study investigates the moderating role of religiosity as a factor that may strengthen cognitive processing tied to the belief in oneself to persevere (i.e., self-efficacy) after trauma and/or as a factor tied to enhanced external social support that religious individuals in particular may benefit from by their involvement in a religious community. Findings revealed (1) social support was tied to greater resilience within the general sample; (2) religious soldiers were less susceptible to traumatic stress than non-religious soldiers; and (3) religiosity moderated the relationship between self-efficacy and traumatic stress but not the relationship between social support and traumatic stress. Implications of findings are discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Lecturer 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 34 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 35 41%