Title |
A randomised, multi-centre, prospective, observer and patient blind study to evaluate a non-absorbable polypropylene mesh vs. a partly absorbable mesh in incisional hernia repair
|
---|---|
Published in |
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00423-012-1009-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
A. Rickert, P. Kienle, A. Kuthe, P. Baumann, R. Engemann, J. Kuhlgatz, M. von Frankenberg, H. P. Knaebel, M. W. Büchler |
Abstract |
The implantation of a polymer mesh is considered as the standard treatment for incisional hernia. It leads to lower recurrence rates compared to suture techniques without mesh implantation; however, there are also some drawbacks to mesh repair. The operation is more complex and peri-operative infectious complications are increased. Yet it is not clear to what extent a mesh implantation influences quality of life or leads to chronic pain or discomfort. The influence of the material, textile structure and size of the mesh remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a non-absorbable, large pore-sized, lightweight polypropylene (PP) mesh leads to a better health outcome compared to a partly absorbable mesh. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 73 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
Researcher | 9 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
Other | 18 | 24% |
Unknown | 15 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 64% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 19 | 25% |