↓ Skip to main content

Geometric analysis of φ4 fields and Ising models. Parts I and II

Overview of attention for article published in Communications in Mathematical Physics, March 1982
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
375 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geometric analysis of φ4 fields and Ising models. Parts I and II
Published in
Communications in Mathematical Physics, March 1982
DOI 10.1007/bf01205659
Authors

Michael Aizenman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Russia 1 4%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 37%
Researcher 4 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 12 44%
Mathematics 9 33%
Philosophy 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 1983.
All research outputs
#7,778,844
of 23,630,563 outputs
Outputs from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#370
of 2,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,029
of 7,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,630,563 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,628 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them