↓ Skip to main content

To eat or not to eat? Kinematics and muscle activity of reach-to-grasp movements are influenced by the action goal, but observers do not detect these differences

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
To eat or not to eat? Kinematics and muscle activity of reach-to-grasp movements are influenced by the action goal, but observers do not detect these differences
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00221-012-3367-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine R. Naish, Arran T. Reader, Carmel Houston-Price, Andrew J. Bremner, Nicholas P. Holmes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 85 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 28%
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Professor 6 7%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 37%
Neuroscience 10 11%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2021.
All research outputs
#14,910,731
of 24,980,180 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#1,690
of 3,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,995
of 292,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#20
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,980,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.