↓ Skip to main content

Physiological quality of dual-purpose wheat seeds from plants subjected to artificial defoliation

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência Rural, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiological quality of dual-purpose wheat seeds from plants subjected to artificial defoliation
Published in
Ciência Rural, November 2016
DOI 10.1590/0103-8478cr20151582
Authors

Giselle Regina Rodolfo, Clovis Arruda Souza, Cileide Maria Medeiros Coelho, Karla Katy Belizario

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#1,057
of 2,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,096
of 318,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#32
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.